| 요약2 |
The objective of this study is to institute the criteria, in particular quantitative criteria- for the review of road facilities that has taken up the biggest portion of unexecuted urban planning facilities in long-term. The quantitative criteria - 9 in total - used for this study are functions of roads, the rate of implementation, the period before implementation, ownership of land (the proportion of government-owned land vs. that of private land), the occupation rate of compensation fee for private building site, the number of obstacle and their area ratio and the slope of roads and the condition of connection on the roads. Based on the total point by road evaluated by item and as a result of Cluster Analysis, it was shown that classifying into 4 groups is the most feasible. The 4 categories of reinvestigation were classified into the following: "existence", "subject to review for existence", "subject to review for elimination", and "elimination." This is a result which is judged to possess significant explanation ability in the primary selections of existence and elimination. Secondly, when compared with the measurement results, 39 places in Iksan City and 3 places in Jangsu County showed contrary results. This is a different that occurs because the government's will was excluded from the quantitative criteria. This study has meanings in that it has clearly presented quantitative criteria, making it possible to sort out urban planning facilities that have been overdue in the 1st round, and that it has tried verifications through comparison with the existent measure matters. |