| 요약1 |
본문에서는, 첫째, 역사부분으로서, 건축가들이 추구했던 거주성이 생활에서의 깃듬을 창조적으로 반영하기 시작한 19세기 중반의 영국주거건축과, 그것의 20세기 초기 독일건축에의 영향, 그리고 마르셀 브로이어의 건축에서 두드러지는 거주성의 추구를 주제적으로 다룰 것이다. 둘째, 예로 제시된 마르셀 브로이어의 개인주택에서는 건축과 삶의 관계를 세 영역, 1) 건축가의 설계, 2) 거주자의 삶, 3) 건축의 유지 및 보수에서 살펴 볼 것이다. |
| 요약2 |
Modern houses designed by Marcel Breuer and maintained by his client, Mr. Stillmann, will be discussed as representative examples of inhabitedness in architecture. In order to trace the inherent tradition of inhabitedness in architecture, the characteristics of the mid 19th Century English domestic architecture, such as practicality and the connection between inside and outside, will be interpreted as an embodiment of 'modern inhabitability.' The arguments and practices of Adolf Loos, Walter Gropius, and Marcel Breuer will be introduced as the modernization of inhabitability. It is not intended to make a chronological connection of them, however, but to suggest a topical concept of inhabitedness in architecture. In sustaining modern inhabitability in American context after the second World War where automobile culture and mass-production culture prospered, architects focused on interior plan making strategy, the use of exterior spaces, and the application of modern construction technology. Simultaneously, creative clients and dwellers, adapting their life style to modern houses, have practiced the renewal of life style change and accordingly the enhancement of their house and site configuration. It could be explained that if architects' design follows foresight, constructive mind, and technology, dweller's constructive maintenance follows hindsight, experience, and cultivation. Both modes of constructive mind and cultivative dwelling are necessary to accomplish inhabitedness in architecture. This paper examines semi-outdoor spaces such as deck, terrace, and porch to explain the contention between architect's intention and real dwelling experience. In Stillmann House I, II, III, and renovated Stillmann House I, decks and screened porches will be dealt in depth as a place of contention as well as an originator of further changes of house and site configuration. |