| 요약2 |
In Korea, the development permit system as a means of development control has recently attracted interest from policy-makers and academics. This interest raises a question about its effectiveness within the Korean context since the introduction of the development permit system. But, in Japan, in order to prevent disordered development in both urban planning zones and quasi-urban planning zones, the development permit system has expanded. In this context, this study is aimed at analyzing Korean and Japanese development permit system within the comparative perspectives, and suggesting policy implications. In doing so, six criteria consists of land-use planning system, land-use regulation system, background of the development permit system, permit authority, permit object, permit procedure, permit standards and enforcement and appeal are selected as an analytical unit. The results of this study shows that there are some similarities and many differences in six comparative criteria. The findings of the study give us some policy implications for building a more effective development permit system in Korea. Firstly, permit standards should be concreted. Secondly, the establishment of a mediation committee and a permit committee will be needed. Finally, a supporting system for the efficient operation of development permit system should be built. |