| 요약2 |
The paper is to study the outstanding issues when we are introducing Building Agreement. The study analyzed the mainly following documents,「Proposal for Revision of Architectural Code (200. 5, 2005. 4)」, 「The 2nd and 3rd meeting minutes of 256th Committee of Construction & Transportation in the National Assembly」, 「Evaluation report of Proposal for Partial Revision in Architectural Code」, and also the press releases were referenced in addition to those. As the result of this research several issues were showed up as follows; Firstly, it turned out to be caused misunderstanding about the citizen rights and permissible building types when we introduced Building Agreement without doing fully public relations. Secondly, the limited time to be completed for the system resulted in difficulties for citizen participation due to lacking of consensus. Thirdly, most of people were reluctant to accept the new system when they thought of it as a restriction. Through these analyses, we need to consider the following factors for retrying Building Agreement afterward; 1. fully public relations to be understood by people what the system really intends; 2. reasonable period to be completed; 3. links with its local district unit plan because it controls the local urban planning for the architectural environmental restriction as well as it is familiar system. |