| 요약2 |
This thesis sets out to study the immanent mechanism of memory and architecture. The memory is a driving force of a human culture. When we see the memory from the side of culture, the most important thing is a problem of representation of cultural memory. Cultural memory does not exist as the personal dimension or abstract sense, which it is stored and reproduced by different cultural representation. Thus, in the cultural memory, it is important to deal with the medium of it. An architecture is the main medium of cultural memory with letters and pictures. So an architecture is performing a typical role of the external memory medium, as a result, the foundation of memory is established as an architecture. When an architecture transmits cultural memory, there are differences in each type of architecture. A monument is counted as controlling means of collective memory, because it is used as propaganda tool of a governing class. A memorial brings one to a recollection of individual or collective death, war, and disaster. As a museum sets in array historical relic, it preserves the memory through an arrangement of the space and the time. In conclusion, it is figured out architectural characteristics discursivity and temporality as the cultural memory medium through these types. This study is focused on theses singularities by the gap concept between a particularity and a universality, and it has also been useful to reveal the architectural singularity through the cultural memory. From this point of view, an architecture is always outward sign that reveals the subject's inner mechanism through memory, mind or psychology. |