| 요약2 |
In this study, the necessity of reorganization of the construction review system, which makes safety management mandatory regardless of
scale, was examined for the efficient evaluation of building structures directly connected to the safety of the building. To this end, first, the
expertise of each country's building permit examination was identified by comparing Korean and overseas building permit systems. Second,
the problems were identified by comparing specific methods of examining and operating construction permits in Korea and Japan. Third, a
survey was conducted for 91 experts who are actually engaged in construction-related work on the contents related to structural review and
whether the reviewer was qualified in terms of building permits. Through this, a direction for improvement of the current architectural review
system was suggested. As a result of the survey, the necessity of the building permit system was high, but a review was required for the
length of the permit period. For a professional and unified architectural structure review, it is necessary to cultivate professional reviewers
who have undergone unified examination education and qualification tests, and to clearly define and maintain the flow of examination. Based
on improvement of the permit system and improvement of the review process, the review period will be shortened, and it is expected that a
more advanced architectural structure review system will be established through mutual understanding and trust building. |